Publication Abstracts
Meyer et al. 2024, accepted
Meyer, K., S. Platnick, G.T. Arnold, N. Amarasinghe, D. Miller, J. Small-Griswold, M. Witte, , S. Gupta, G. McFarquhar, and J. O'Brien, 2024: Evaluating spectral cloud effective radius retrievals from the Enhanced MODIS Airborne Simulator (eMAS) during ORACLES. Atmos. Meas. Tech., accepted.
Satellite remote sensing retrievals of cloud effective radius (CER) are widely used for studies of aerosol/cloud interactions. Such retrievals, however, rely on forward radiative transfer (RT) calculations using simplified assumptions that can lead to retrieval errors when the real atmosphere deviates from the forward model. Here, coincident airborne remote sensing and in situ observations obtained during NASA's ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES) field campaign are used to evaluate retrievals of CER for marine boundary layer stratocumulus clouds and to explore impacts of forward RT model assumptions and other confounding factors. Specifically, spectral CER retrievals from the Enhanced MODIS Airborne Simulator (eMAS) and the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP) are compared with polarimetric retrievals from RSP and with CER derived from droplet size distributions (DSDs) observed by the Phase Doppler Interferometer (PDI) and a combination of the Cloud and Aerosol Spectrometer (CAS) and two dimensional Stereo probe (2D-S). The sensitivities of the eMAS and RSP spectral retrievals to assumptions on the DSD effective variance (CEV) and liquid water complex index of refraction are explored. CER and CEV inferred from eMAS spectral reflectance observations of the backscatter glory provide additional context for the spectral CER retrievals. The spectral and polarimetric CER retrieval agreement is case dependent, and updating the retrieval RT assumptions, including using RSP polarimetric CEV retrievals as a constraint, yields mixed results that are tied to differing sensitivities to vertical heterogeneity. Moreover, the in situ cloud probes, often used as the benchmark for remote sensing CER retrieval assessments, themselves do not agree, with PDI DSDs yielding CER 1.3-1.6 µm larger than CAS and CEV roughly 50-60% smaller than CAS. Implications for the interpretation of spectral and polarimetric CER retrievals and their agreement are discussed.
- View preprint on EGUsphere.
- Please note that linked preprint is probably not the final, accepted text.
Export citation: [ BibTeX ] [ RIS ]
BibTeX Citation
@unpublished{me08300m,
author={Meyer, K. and Platnick, S. and Arnold, G. T. and Amarasinghe, N. and Miller, D. and Small-Griswold, J. and Witte, M. and Cairns, B. and Gupta, S. and McFarquhar, G. and O'Brien, J.},
title={Evaluating spectral cloud effective radius retrievals from the Enhanced MODIS Airborne Simulator (eMAS) during ORACLES},
year={2024},
journal={Atmospheric Measurement Techniques},
}
[ Close ]
RIS Citation
TY - INPR ID - me08300m AU - Meyer, K. AU - Platnick, S. AU - Arnold, G. T. AU - Amarasinghe, N. AU - Miller, D. AU - Small-Griswold, J. AU - Witte, M. AU - Cairns, B. AU - Gupta, S. AU - McFarquhar, G. AU - O'Brien, J. PY - 2024 TI - Evaluating spectral cloud effective radius retrievals from the Enhanced MODIS Airborne Simulator (eMAS) during ORACLES JA - Atmos. Meas. Tech. JO - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques ER -
[ Close ]
