Publication Abstracts

Abramowitz et al. 2019

Abramowitz, G., N. Herger, E. Gutmann, D. Hammerling, R. Knutti, M. Leduc, R. Lorenz, R. Pincus, and G.A. Schmidt, 2019: Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing. Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 91-105, doi:10.5194/esd-10-91-2019.

Back to top The rationale for using multi-model ensembles in climate change projections and impacts research is often based on the expectation that different models constitute independent estimates; therefore, a range of models allows a better characterisation of the uncertainties in the representation of the climate system than a single model. However, it is known that research groups share literature, ideas for representations of processes, parameterisations, evaluation data sets and even sections of model code. Thus, nominally different models might have similar biases because of similarities in the way they represent a subset of processes, or even be near-duplicates of others, weakening the assumption that they constitute independent estimates. If there are near-replicates of some models, then treating all models equally is likely to bias the inferences made using these ensembles. The challenge is to establish the degree to which this might be true for any given application. While this issue is recognised by many in the community, quantifying and accounting for model dependence in anything other than an ad-hoc way is challenging. Here we present a synthesis of the range of disparate attempts to define, quantify and address model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles in a common conceptual framework, and provide guidance on how users can test the efficacy of approaches that move beyond the equally weighted ensemble. In the upcoming Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6), several new models that are closely related to existing models are anticipated, as well as large ensembles from some models. We argue that quantitatively accounting for dependence in addition to model performance, and thoroughly testing the effectiveness of the approach used will be key to a sound interpretation of the CMIP ensembles in future scientific studies.

Export citation: [ BibTeX ] [ RIS ]

BibTeX Citation

@article{ab04000e,
  author={Abramowitz, G. and Herger, N. and Gutmann, E. and Hammerling, D. and Knutti, R. and Leduc, M. and Lorenz, R. and Pincus, R. and Schmidt, G. A.},
  title={Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing},
  year={2019},
  journal={Earth Syst. Dynam.},
  volume={10},
  pages={91--105},
  doi={10.5194/esd-10-91-2019},
}

[ Close ]

RIS Citation

TY  - JOUR
ID  - ab04000e
AU  - Abramowitz, G.
AU  - Herger, N.
AU  - Gutmann, E.
AU  - Hammerling, D.
AU  - Knutti, R.
AU  - Leduc, M.
AU  - Lorenz, R.
AU  - Pincus, R.
AU  - Schmidt, G. A.
PY  - 2019
TI  - Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing
JA  - Earth Syst. Dynam.
VL  - 10
SP  - 91
EP  - 105
DO  - 10.5194/esd-10-91-2019
ER  -

[ Close ]

• Return to 2019 Publications

• Return to Publications Homepage